drunk driving: is video

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is video 1.00
is videos 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(driving, is videos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(driving, is video)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(driving, is videos)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(driving, is videos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(drunk driving, is video)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is videos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is videos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is videos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(drunk driving, is videos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is video)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(driving, is video)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(driving, is videos)