drunk people: repeat themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.41
Siblings drunk
Weight: 0.35
, different people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
repeat themselves 1.00
talk to themselves 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drunk, repeat themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drunk, talk to themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(homeless person, talk to themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drunk, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk, repeat themselves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(homeless person, talk to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(homeless person, talk to themselves)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drunk, talk to themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drunk, talk to themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(drunk people, repeat themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drunk people, talk to themselves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(drunk people, talk to themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drunk people, repeat themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(homeless person, talk to themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk, repeat themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drunk, talk to themselves)