drunk people: talk to themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.41
Siblings drunk
Weight: 0.35
, different people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33
, good person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
talk to themselves 1.00
repeat themselves 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drunk, talk to themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(homeless person, talk to themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drunk, repeat themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(homeless person, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(homeless person, talk to themselves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(drunk, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drunk, talk to themselves)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drunk, repeat themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk, repeat themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drunk people, talk to themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drunk people, repeat themselves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(drunk people, repeat themselves)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(drunk people, repeat themselves)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, repeat themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(drunk people, talk to themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(homeless person, talk to themselves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drunk, talk to themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk people, talk to themselves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk, repeat themselves)