duck: be at wetland area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, goose
Weight: 0.36
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, pigeon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wetland area 1.00
be at wetland 0.98
be at lake 0.81
be at in forest 0.76
be at forest 0.76
land on tree 0.76
land on beach 0.75
be at state park 0.75
be at park 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland area)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland area)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be at park)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(duck, be at wetland area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(duck, be at wetland area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(duck, be at wetland area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pigeon, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pigeon, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(duck, be at wetland area)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(duck, be at wetland)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(duck, be at wetland)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(duck, be at park)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(duck, be at lake)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(duck, be at lake)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(duck, be at lake)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(duck, be at park)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at lake)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(duck, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(duck, be at wetland area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bird, be at park)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pigeon, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bird, be at park)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(duck, be at wetland area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)