duck: quack in morning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fowl
Weight: 0.66
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings goldeneye
Weight: 0.64
, mallard
Weight: 0.60
, coot
Weight: 0.58
, snow goose
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
quack in morning 1.00
quack 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mallard, quack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mallard, quack)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mallard, quack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(duck, quack in morning)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duck, quack)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(duck, quack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(duck, quack)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(duck, quack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duck, quack in morning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(duck, quack in morning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duck, quack in morning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mallard, quack)