duct tape: be stickier than scotch tape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adhesive tape
Weight: 0.85
, material
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.62
Siblings magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.36
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stickier than scotch tape 1.00
get less sticky 0.82
get sticky 0.79
be sticky 0.78
is sticky 0.78
be called scotch 0.78
be called liquid tape 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tape, is sticky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tape, be called liquid tape)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tape, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tape, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tape, get less sticky)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tape, get less sticky)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tape, get sticky)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tape, be sticky)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tape, is sticky)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tape, get less sticky)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tape, be sticky)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tape, get sticky)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tape, is sticky)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, is sticky)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tape, is sticky)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tape, be called liquid tape)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tape, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tape, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(tape, get less sticky)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(scotch tape, is sticky)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, is sticky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(duct tape, is sticky)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(duct tape, is sticky)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(duct tape, is sticky)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, is sticky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tape, get less sticky)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tape, get sticky)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tape, be sticky)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, is sticky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(scotch tape, is sticky)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tape, get less sticky)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tape, be called liquid tape)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tape, get sticky)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tape, be sticky)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(duct tape, be stickier than scotch tape)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, is sticky)