duct tape: tear yet durable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adhesive tape
Weight: 0.85
, material
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.62
Siblings magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.36
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
tear yet durable 1.00
tear durable 0.97
be improved by technology more durable than original 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duct tape, tear yet durable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(duct tape, tear yet durable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(duct tape, tear yet durable)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(duct tape, tear durable)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(duct tape, tear durable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(duct tape, tear durable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, tear durable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, tear yet durable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duct tape, tear yet durable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duct tape, tear yet durable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)