dummy: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stuff
Weight: 0.52
, book
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, robot
Weight: 0.46
, comforter
Weight: 0.46
Siblings moby dick
Weight: 0.30
, decoy
Weight: 0.30
, trick
Weight: 0.30
, flip flop
Weight: 0.29
, puppet
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89
have in hole 0.89
has physical part hole 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dummy, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dummy, have in hole)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dummy, have in hole)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(dummy, have in hole)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dummy, have in hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dummy, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dummy, have holes in them)