dumpling: taste good

Related concepts

Parents	dish Weight: 0.71 , fare Weight: 0.60 , item Weight: 0.60 , soup Weight: 0.52 , food Weight: 0.51
Siblings	ravioli Weight: 0.38 , spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.38 , potato salad Weight: 0.37 , sauerkraut Weight: 0.37 , cheesecake Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
taste good	1.00
smell bad	0.79
has quality good	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(soup, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(dish, smell bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(dish, smell bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(dish, smell bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(dumpling, taste good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(soup, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(dumpling, taste good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(dish, smell bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(dumpling, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(sauerkraut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(sauerkraut, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(cheesecake, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(dumpling, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(dumpling, smell bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(dumpling, has quality good)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, smell bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(dumpling, smell bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(dumpling, smell bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(dumpling, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(dumpling, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(dumpling, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(sauerkraut, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(cheesecake, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(dish, smell bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(dumpling, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, has quality good)