dust mite: be at rug

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dust
Weight: 0.76
, organism
Weight: 0.68
, bug
Weight: 0.67
, microorganism
Weight: 0.67
, particle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bed bug
Weight: 0.69
, mite
Weight: 0.36
, fungus
Weight: 0.35
, insect
Weight: 0.35
, snail
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rug 1.00
be at on rug 0.99
be at carpet 0.87
be at under carpet 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dust, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bug, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dust, be at carpet)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be at under carpet)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bug, be at rug)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dust, be at under carpet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dust, be at carpet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dust, be at rug)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bug, be at rug)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dust, be at carpet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dust, be at rug)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dust, be at under carpet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mite, be at carpet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mite, be at rug)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dust, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bug, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dust, be at carpet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be at under carpet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mite, be at rug)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(mite, be at carpet)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mite, be at carpet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dust mite, be at rug)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dust mite, be at on rug)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at on rug)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at on rug)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dust mite, be at on rug)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dust mite, be at rug)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dust, be at rug)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dust, be at under carpet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bug, be at rug)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dust, be at carpet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mite, be at rug)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mite, be at carpet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(dust, be at rug)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dust, be at under carpet)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bug, be at rug)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dust mite, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dust, be at carpet)