dust storm: is video

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.60
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.59
, weather
Weight: 0.55
, source
Weight: 0.51
, storm
Weight: 0.50
Siblings cold weather
Weight: 0.34
, bad weather
Weight: 0.33
, tornado
Weight: 0.33
, typhoon
Weight: 0.33
, hurricane
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is video 1.00
is videos 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(source, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dust storm, is video)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(source, is video)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(source, is video)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(source, is video)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dust storm, is video)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(dust storm, is video)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dust storm, is videos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dust storm, is videos)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dust storm, is videos)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(dust storm, is videos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dust storm, is video)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dust storm, is video)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(source, is video)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(dust storm, is video)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(source, is video)