dust: be bad for body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aerosol
Weight: 0.65
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.62
, matter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flue
Weight: 0.45
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.34
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.34
, smog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for body 1.00
effect human body 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dust, be bad for body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aerosol, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dust, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dust, be bad for body)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dust, effect human body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dust, effect human body)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dust, effect human body)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dust, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dust, effect human body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dust, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dust, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aerosol, has quality bad)