dust: be important in cloud formation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aerosol
Weight: 0.65
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.62
, matter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flue
Weight: 0.45
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.34
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.34
, smog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in cloud formation 1.00
be needed clouds form 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)