dust: cause explosion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aerosol
Weight: 0.65
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.62
, matter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flue
Weight: 0.45
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.34
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.34
, smog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause explosion 1.00
explode 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(aerosol, explode)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dust, cause explosion)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(aerosol, explode)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, explode)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(aerosol, explode)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dust, cause explosion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(dust, cause explosion)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dust, explode)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dust, explode)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dust, explode)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dust, explode)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dust, cause explosion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dust, cause explosion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(aerosol, explode)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dust, cause explosion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(aerosol, explode)