dust: effect human body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aerosol
Weight: 0.65
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.62
, matter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flue
Weight: 0.45
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.34
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.34
, smog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
effect human body 1.00
be bad for body 0.79
effect computer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dust, effect human body)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dust, effect computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dust, be bad for body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dust, effect computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dust, effect computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dust, effect computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dust, be bad for body)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dust, be bad for body)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dust, be bad for body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dust, effect human body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dust, effect human body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dust, effect human body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for body)