duty: call of is 3 rated t

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expectation
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, order
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings code
Weight: 0.61
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, promotion
Weight: 0.57
, privilege
Weight: 0.31
, burden
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
call of is 3 rated t 1.00
call of is 3 rated t for 1.00
call of is rated t 0.97
call of is 3 t 0.93
call of is 3 t for 0.92
call of is 4 rated m 0.92
call of is 5 rated m 0.91
call of is 6 rated m 0.91
call of is 4 m 0.82
call of is ops 2 rated 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(duty, call of is rated t)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is rated t)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(duty, call of is rated t)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t for)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t for)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 4 rated m)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 4 rated m)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 6 rated m)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 6 rated m)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 4 rated m)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 5 rated m)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 6 rated m)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is 4 rated m)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 5 rated m)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is 6 rated m)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 5 rated m)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 3 t)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is 5 rated m)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t for)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 t)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is rated t)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is 3 t)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(duty, call of is 3 t)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is 3 rated t)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duty, call of is 3 rated t)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(duty, call of is 3 rated t)