duty: call of is fun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expectation
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, order
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings code
Weight: 0.61
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, promotion
Weight: 0.57
, privilege
Weight: 0.31
, burden
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
call of is fun 1.00
call of is more popular game 0.82
call of is bad game 0.81
call of is game 0.81
call of is crap 0.79
call of is best game ever 0.78
is funny 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(duty, call of is fun)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is more popular game)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is more popular game)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(duty, call of is more popular game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is best game ever)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is best game ever)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(duty, call of is best game ever)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(duty, call of is more popular game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(duty, call of is game)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(duty, call of is best game ever)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is bad game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(duty, call of is game)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(duty, call of is crap)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(duty, call of is bad game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(duty, call of is crap)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is crap)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is crap)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(duty, call of is bad game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is bad game)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(duty, is funny)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(duty, is funny)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(duty, call of is fun)