dwarf: is fucking bitter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, race
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
, variety
Weight: 0.49
, activity
Weight: 0.48
Siblings midget
Weight: 0.36
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.32
, giant sequoia
Weight: 0.32
, great ape
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fucking bitter 1.00
has bitterness bitter 0.82
suck ass 0.78
is angry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dwarf, is fucking bitter)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, has bitterness bitter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dwarf, has bitterness bitter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dwarf, has bitterness bitter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dwarf, has bitterness bitter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dwarf, suck ass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, suck ass)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dwarf, suck ass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dwarf, suck ass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, is angry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dwarf, is angry)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dwarf, is angry)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dwarf, is angry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dwarf, is fucking bitter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dwarf, is fucking bitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dwarf, is fucking bitter)