dynamite: be improvement on explosives

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explosive
Weight: 0.69
, song
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.53
, weapon
Weight: 0.51
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pipe bomb
Weight: 0.37
, gunpowder
Weight: 0.36
, hand grenade
Weight: 0.34
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be improvement on explosives 1.00
be improvement on other explosives 0.99
is explosive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(gunpowder, is explosive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(gunpowder, is explosive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(gunpowder, is explosive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on other explosives)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dynamite, be improvement on other explosives)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dynamite, be improvement on other explosives)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on other explosives)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dynamite, is explosive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(dynamite, is explosive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dynamite, is explosive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, is explosive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dynamite, be improvement on explosives)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gunpowder, is explosive)