earwig: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.55
, spider
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, creature
Weight: 0.41
, problem
Weight: 0.19
Siblings aphid
Weight: 0.35
, housefly
Weight: 0.34
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.34
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.34
, ladybug
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bug, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(earwig, be bad year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bug, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bug, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be bad year)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bug, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(earwig, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(gypsy moth, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aphid, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aphid, be bad year)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ladybug, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aphid, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aphid, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(earwig, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(earwig, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(earwig, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(earwig, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(earwig, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bug, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gypsy moth, be bad year)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aphid, be bad year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ladybug, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aphid, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(earwig, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bug, has quality bad)