earwig: has physical part pincers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.55
, spider
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, creature
Weight: 0.41
, problem
Weight: 0.19
Siblings aphid
Weight: 0.35
, housefly
Weight: 0.34
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.34
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.34
, ladybug
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part pincers 1.00
has physical part wings 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(earwig, has physical part pincers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(earwig, has physical part pincers)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(earwig, has physical part wings)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(earwig, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(earwig, has physical part wings)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(earwig, has physical part pincers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(earwig, has physical part pincers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)