eat in fast food restaurant: requires go to chain restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires go to chain restaurant 1.00
be used to avoid restaurant wait 0.78
be used to have burger 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to avoid restaurant wait)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to avoid restaurant wait)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to avoid restaurant wait)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to have burger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to have burger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to have burger)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to avoid restaurant wait)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(eat in fast food restaurant, be used to have burger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(eat in fast food restaurant, requires go to chain restaurant)