eat in restaurant: requires time for diggestion

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires time for diggestion 1.00
causes good time 0.83
be motivated by save time 0.77
requires money 0.77
requires be prepare to pay 0.76
requires place order 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, causes good time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, be motivated by save time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires place order)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, causes good time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, be motivated by save time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires place order)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, be motivated by save time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires be prepare to pay)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires be prepare to pay)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires place order)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires be prepare to pay)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires be prepare to pay)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires place order)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires money)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, be motivated by save time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, causes good time)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(eat in restaurant, requires money)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, causes good time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(eat in restaurant, requires time for diggestion)