eat meal: be at cafeteria

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cafeteria 1.00
be at kitchen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(eat meal, be at cafeteria)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(eat meal, be at kitchen)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(eat meal, be at kitchen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(eat meal, be at kitchen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(eat meal, be at kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(eat meal, be at cafeteria)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(eat meal, be at cafeteria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eat meal, be at cafeteria)