eat: requires work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, food
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, day
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.34
, junk food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.33
, fresh food
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires work 1.00
do not work well 0.80
requires go to resaurant 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eat, requires work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(eat, requires work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(eat, requires work)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eat, requires go to resaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(eat, requires go to resaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(eat, requires go to resaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires go to resaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eat, requires work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(eat, requires work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)