eating disorder: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.86
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.83
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.74
, mental illness
Weight: 0.72
Siblings bulimia
Weight: 0.74
, overeating
Weight: 0.72
, obesity
Weight: 0.67
, depression
Weight: 0.65
, purging
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is national problem 0.91
be problem in world 0.90
is big problem 0.88
be such problem in states 0.86
is serious problem 0.86
be such problem today 0.86
be less of problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem for society 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mental illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mental illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, has state problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, is serious problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mental illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mental illness, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mental disorder, be less of problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(bulimia, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bulimia, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bulimia, is serious problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bulimia, is serious problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(eating disorder, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bulimia, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bulimia, is serious problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mental illness, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mental disorder, be less of problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mental illness, has state problem)