eating: be good for environment

Related concepts

Parents	habit Weight: 0.63 , activity Weight: 0.63 , thing Weight: 0.62 , ritual Weight: 0.58 , game Weight: 0.58
Siblings	eating apple Weight: 0.36 , eating breakfast Weight: 0.36 , fasting Weight: 0.34 , exercising Weight: 0.34 , bad food Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for environment	1.00
has quality good	0.80
be bad for planet	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(eating, be good for environment)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ritual, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(eating, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(ritual, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(ritual, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(fasting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(eating, be good for environment)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ritual, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(eating, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

Remarkable(bad food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(fasting, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(fasting, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(eating, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(eating, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(eating, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(eating, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(eating, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fasting, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Typical(eating, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(game, has quality good)