echidna: has physical part claws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part claws 1.00
have sharp claws 0.89
has physical part eyes 0.81
has physical part snouts 0.80
has physical part tongue 0.80
has physical part tongues 0.79
has physical part spines 0.78
has physical part feet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have sharp claws)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(echidna, have sharp claws)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(echidna, have sharp claws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(echidna, have sharp claws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)