echidna: has physical part feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part feet 1.00
have backwards feet 0.82
has physical part eyes 0.80
have poisonous feet 0.77
has physical part claws 0.76
has physical part tongue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(echidna, have backwards feet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(echidna, have backwards feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(echidna, have poisonous feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)