echidna: have backwards feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have backwards feet 1.00
has physical part feet 0.82
have poisonous feet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(echidna, have backwards feet)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(echidna, have poisonous feet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(echidna, have backwards feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have backwards feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)