echidna: have spikes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have spikes 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, have spikes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(crocodile, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(crocodile, have spikes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(echidna, have spikes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have spikes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(echidna, have spikes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have spikes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(crocodile, have spikes)