echinoderm: be considered more advanced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered more advanced 1.00
be considered be 0.78
be considered related 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)