echinoderm: be considered related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered related 1.00
be considered be 0.88
be considered related to chordates 0.85
be considered closely related 0.82
be considered closely related to chordates 0.78
be considered more advanced 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered closely related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered closely related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered closely related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered be)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered closely related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered more advanced)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related)