echinoderm: be related to chordates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to chordates 1.00
be considered related to chordates 0.96
be closely related to chordates 0.87
be considered closely related to chordates 0.87
be more closely related to chordates 0.87
is deuterostomes 0.83
be classified as deuterostomes 0.78
be classified into phylum chordata 0.77
be considered closest relative to chordates 0.77
be thought have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be more closely related to chordates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be more closely related to chordates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be closely related to chordates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be more closely related to chordates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be more closely related to chordates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be closely related to chordates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be closely related to chordates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered closest relative to chordates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be closely related to chordates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be thought have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered closest relative to chordates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered closest relative to chordates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be thought have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be thought have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered closest relative to chordates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be thought have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)