echinoderm: be restricted to marine habitats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be restricted to marine habitats 1.00
be considered invertebrates 0.78
be different from invertebrates 0.77
be different from other invertebrates 0.77
is invertebrates 0.77
is most complex invertebrates 0.75
is complex invertebrates 0.75
be considered advanced invertebrates 0.75
be considered most advanced invertebrates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(starfish, is invertebrates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(starfish, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(starfish, is invertebrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be different from invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be different from other invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is most complex invertebrates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered most advanced invertebrates)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(starfish, is invertebrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be restricted to marine habitats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)