ecologist: study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.62
, expert
Weight: 0.61
, biologist
Weight: 0.54
, researcher
Weight: 0.51
, economist
Weight: 0.47
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.36
, zoologist
Weight: 0.35
, archaeologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
study 1.00
study population 0.87
study specific population 0.84
study population of organisms 0.81
study population species 0.80
study specific population of organisms 0.79
study population then species 0.79
study specific population species 0.79
study population rather species 0.78
study specific population then species 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeologist, study)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(archaeologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ecologist, study)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population of organisms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population of organisms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study population then species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study specific population then species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population then species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population of organisms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population of organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population then species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population then species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population of organisms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population then species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population species)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population of organisms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population then species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population then species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecologist, study population rather species)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population of organisms)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study specific population species)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population of organisms)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ecologist, study specific population species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)