ecology: affect areas of science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect areas of science 1.00
affect other areas of science 0.98
affect areas 0.90
affect other areas 0.89
be related to science 0.87
be important to science 0.87
be different from areas of biology 0.87
be science 0.87
be different from other areas of biology 0.86
is science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(ecology, affect areas of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)