ecology: be considered interdisciplinary science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered interdisciplinary science 1.00
is interdisciplinary science 0.99
is interdisciplinary 0.96
is multidisciplinary science 0.94
is multidisciplinary 0.87
be considered science 0.85
be important to science 0.85
be science 0.85
is science 0.85
be new science 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)