ecology: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
be science 0.94
is science 0.93
be important to science 0.91
be new science 0.90
be related to science 0.90
be described as science 0.88
be considered interdisciplinary science 0.85
is practical science 0.85
affect areas of science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be described as science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be described as science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, be described as science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, be described as science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ecology, be described as science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ecology, be described as science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ecology, is practical science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ecology, be described as science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ecology, be described as science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ecology, is practical science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)