ecology: be important to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to science 1.00
be science 0.96
is science 0.96
be new science 0.93
be considered science 0.91
be related to science 0.91
be important to environmental science 0.90
is practical science 0.88
affect areas of science 0.87
affect other areas of science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ecology, is practical science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ecology, is practical science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(ecology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)