ecology: be related to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to science 1.00
be science 0.93
is science 0.92
be important to science 0.91
be related to environmental science 0.91
be new science 0.90
be considered science 0.90
affect other areas of science 0.88
affect areas of science 0.87
be important to environmental science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to environmental science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to environmental science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to environmental science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to environmental science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)