ecology: is holistic science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is holistic science 1.00
is holistic 0.95
be described as holistic science 0.95
is practical science 0.83
is multidisciplinary science 0.82
is interdisciplinary science 0.82
be important to science 0.81
be considered interdisciplinary science 0.81
is science 0.81
be science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ecology, is holistic)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ecology, is practical science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be described as holistic science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ecology, is practical science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)