ecology: is interdisciplinary science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interdisciplinary science 1.00
be considered interdisciplinary science 0.99
is interdisciplinary 0.97
is multidisciplinary science 0.94
is multidisciplinary 0.88
is science 0.85
be science 0.85
be important to science 0.84
be new science 0.83
is holistic science 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is holistic science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)