ecology: is multidisciplinary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is multidisciplinary 1.00
is multidisciplinary science 0.97
is interdisciplinary 0.91
is interdisciplinary science 0.88
be considered interdisciplinary science 0.87
is holistic science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is holistic science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)