ecology: is multidisciplinary science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is multidisciplinary science 1.00
is multidisciplinary 0.97
is interdisciplinary science 0.94
be considered interdisciplinary science 0.94
is interdisciplinary 0.92
is holistic science 0.82
is science 0.81
be science 0.80
be new science 0.80
be important to science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered interdisciplinary science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is interdisciplinary science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is interdisciplinary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is holistic science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecology, is multidisciplinary science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is multidisciplinary science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)