ecology: is practical science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is practical science 1.00
is practical 0.93
be important to science 0.88
is science 0.88
be science 0.87
be new science 0.87
be considered science 0.85
be related to science 0.84
be important to environmental science 0.83
is holistic science 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ecology, is practical science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ecology, is practical science)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ecology, is practical)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, is practical)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ecology, is holistic science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ecology, is holistic science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to environmental science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ecology, is holistic science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is holistic science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to environmental science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ecology, is practical science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ecology, is practical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)