ecology: is required science topic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is required science topic 1.00
is science topic 0.96
be important to science 0.83
be related to science 0.82
be considered science 0.81
is science 0.81
be science 0.80
be new science 0.79
affect areas of science 0.79
affect other areas of science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is required science topic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ecology, is required science topic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, be science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, is required science topic)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, is science topic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ecology, is science topic)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science topic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science topic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecology, be considered science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ecology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ecology, be important to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ecology, be science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ecology, be new science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ecology, is required science topic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ecology, is required science topic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)