ecosystem: be dynamic in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.73
, coral reef
Weight: 0.67
, estuary
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.65
, ocean
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dynamic in nature 1.00
survive in nature 0.81
be changed by nature 0.80
function as dynamic systems 0.80
maintain balance of nature 0.77
be important to environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, survive in nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be changed by nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ecosystem, function as dynamic systems)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ecosystem, maintain balance of nature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, function as dynamic systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, maintain balance of nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ecosystem, survive in nature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, function as dynamic systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, maintain balance of nature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ecosystem, survive in nature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, survive in nature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecosystem, function as dynamic systems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ecosystem, maintain balance of nature)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be changed by nature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be changed by nature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be changed by nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to environment)