ecosystem: be valuable for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.73
, coral reef
Weight: 0.67
, estuary
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.65
, ocean
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable for humans 1.00
be important for humans 0.92
be important to humans 0.90
be important to survival of humans 0.81
be important for us 0.78
be important to us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(environment, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(environment, be important for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(environment, be important for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important for humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(environment, be important for us)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(estuary, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to survival of humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to survival of humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to survival of humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to survival of humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(estuary, be important for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(ecosystem, be valuable for humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)