ecosystem: need organisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.73
, coral reef
Weight: 0.67
, estuary
Weight: 0.66
, fish
Weight: 0.65
, ocean
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
need organisms 1.00
be important to humans 0.79
be important for humans 0.78
need predators 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important for humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(estuary, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ecosystem, need organisms)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ecosystem, need organisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to humans)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, need organisms)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(estuary, be important for humans)